Volume 7, Issue 3 (Journal of Studies in Applied Language (JSAL) 2024)
JSAL 2024, 7(3): 125-153 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Alsuwayna H S, Alyousef H. (2024). Theme structure and thematic progression patterns in Anthropology research article introductions Written in English by Saudi and Anglophone academic writers [In English]. JSAL. 7(3), 125-153.
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-150-en.html
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-150-en.html
1- MA of English Language and Literature Faculty of Arts, Qassim University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2- Professor, Department of English Language and Literature Faculty of Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia , hesham.alyousef@gmail.com
2- Professor, Department of English Language and Literature Faculty of Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia , hesham.alyousef@gmail.com
Abstract: (231 Views)
Introductions to research articles establish the context of the study and present its rationale and objectives. Hence, research article introductions serve as an important guide, enabling readers to fully explore the research paper's potential. This importance incites the need to cultivate insights into the ideal scholarly writing practices. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of studies investigating the rhetoric in research article introductions in social sciences. This paper employed a comparative approach to investigate the thematic choices and patterns of thematic progression in the introductions to anthropology research articles written in English by Saudi English writers and Anglophone academic writers. Utilizing Halliday’s systemic functional linguistic approach and the Daneš thematic progression model, we analyzed 14 research article introductions authored by Saudi English writers and Anglophone academic writers. The findings revealed that both groups exhibit quantitative and qualitative similarities in their thematic choices. Nonetheless, we observed notable differences in thematic progression usage between the two groups. Despite these variations, both groups employed thematic progression patterns and contextual frames for similar rhetorical functions. This finding highlights the importance of targeting English-language instruction. By addressing specific areas of variation, educators can help Saudi English writers improve their academic writing proficiency and facilitate their integration into the scholarly community.
Keywords: Anthropology Research Articles, Thematic Organization, Thematic Structure, Comparative Rhetoric
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Language Teaching
Received: 2024/04/25 | Accepted: 2024/07/23 | Published: 2024/09/14
Received: 2024/04/25 | Accepted: 2024/07/23 | Published: 2024/09/14
References
1. Al Bakaa, A. J. (2014). Investigating individual voice in thematic development in academic assignments written by Iraqi and Australian postgraduate students. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 66-84. DOI:10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6710 [DOI:10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6710]
2. Alghamdi, G. A., Alyousef, H. S. (2022). The construction of knowledge claims in three disciplines: An exploration of hedging and boosting strategies in research articles written in English by Arab and Anglophone writers Journal of Language and Education, 8(2), 18-34. DOI: 10.17323/jle.2022.12363 [DOI:10.17323/jle.2022.12363]
3. Alotaibi, H. S. (2020). The thematic structure in research article abstracts: Variations across disciplines. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1756146. DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2020.1756146 [DOI:10.1080/23311983.2020.1756146]
4. Alvin, L. P. (2015). Topical themes and thematic progression: The "picture" of research articles. Text & Talk, 35(3), 289-315. DOI: 10.1515/text-2015-0001 [DOI:10.1515/text-2015-0001]
5. Alyousef, H. S. (2020). A multimodal discourse analysis of English dentistry texts written by Saudi undergraduate students: A study of theme and information structure. Open Linguistics, 6, 267-283. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2020-0103 [DOI:10.1515/opli-2020-0103]
6. Alyousef, H. S. (2021). The status of theme in research article abstracts in seven dentistry subdisciplines: A text-based intradisciplinary study. Journal of Language and Education, 7(1), 28-45. DOI: 10.17323/jle.2021.10574 [DOI:10.17323/jle.2021.10574]
7. Alyousef, H. S., Alsharif, A. A. (2019). Thematic progression in Saudi postgraduate Business students' multimodal written texts: an SF-MDA accounting discourse. Journal of English Educators Society, 4(2), 1-7. DOI:10.21070/jees.v4i2.2582 [DOI:10.21070/jees.v4i2.2582]
8. Alyousef, H. S., Alsharif, M. H. (2020). A contrastive study of theme types and patterns in medical research article abstracts written in English by native and Saudi scholars. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Language Sciences & Literature, 26(1), 367-387. [DOI:10.54940/ll44457307]
9. Alyousef, H. S., & Alzahrani, A. A. (2020). A functional analysis of thematic organization in electrical engineering research article introductions written in English by native and Saudi scholars: A comparative study. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(2), 114-141. DOI: 10.24093/awej/vol11no2.9 [DOI:10.24093/awej/vol11no2.9]
10. Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective, 147, 106-128). Academia. DOI: 10.1515/9783111676524.106 [DOI:10.1515/9783111676524.106]
11. Ebrahimi, S. F., Chan, S. H. (2015). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and economics: Functional analysis of the grammatical subject. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(4), 381-397. DOI: 10.1080/07268602.2015.1070660 [DOI:10.1080/07268602.2015.1070660]
12. Ebrahimi, S. F., Chan, S. H., Ain, N. A. (2014). Discourse functions of grammatical subject in results and discussion sections of research article across four disciplines. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 125-140. DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.2 [DOI:10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.2]
13. Fan, L., Ma, W. (2022). Thematic progression in Economic discourse: A case study of the English-Chinese reports from the Economist. International Journal of English Linguistics, 12(1). DOI: 10.5539/ijel.v12n1p86 [DOI:10.5539/ijel.v12n1p86]
14. Fang, D., Li, S. (2015). Thematic structure and its application to English writing, International Conference on Education Reform and Modern Management. [DOI:10.2991/ermm-15.2015.69]
15. Gómez González, M. d. l. Á. (2001). The theme-topic interface: Evidence from English, John Benjamins Publishing. [DOI:10.1075/pbns.71]
16. Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Introduction to Functional Grammar. Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, 4th edition, Taylor & Francis. [DOI:10.4324/9780203783771]
17. Huang, S., Song, M. (2022). Comparing the move structure and thematic progression pattern of Chinese and native speakers' English research article abstracts (RAA): A corpus based study of Aeronautics RAA. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 8(4), 302-308. DOI: 10.18178/IJLLL.2022.8.4.366 [DOI:10.18178/IJLLL.2022.8.4.366]
18. Jing, W. (2015). Theme and thematic progression in English writing teaching. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 178-187.
19. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524650 [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139524650]
20. Khedri, M., Ebrahimi, S. F. (2012a). The essence of thematic structures in the academic translated texts. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(1), 37-43. [DOI:10.4304/jltr.3.6.1175-1179]
21. Khedri, M., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2012b). Multiple theme in English and Persian. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1128-1133. DOI: 10.4304/tpls.2.6.1128-1133 [DOI:10.4304/tpls.2.6.1128-1133]
22. Leong, A. (2022). Thematic and rhematic progression in scientific writing: A pilot study. Journal of Language and Literature, 22(1), 238-254. DOI: 10.24071/joll.v22i1.4117 [DOI:10.24071/joll.v22i1.4117]
23. Leong, A. P., Toh, A. L. L., Chin, S. F. (2018). Examining structure in scientific research articles: A study of thematic progression and thematic density. Written communication, 35(3), 286-314. DOI: 10.1177/0741088318767378 [DOI:10.1177/0741088318767378]
24. Luthfianda, S. N., Kurniawan, E., Gunawan, W. (2021). Rhetorical structures of introductions in soft and hard science international journals written by Indonesian scholars. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(2), 343-358. DOI: 10.21462/jeltl.v6i2.563 [DOI:10.21462/jeltl.v6i2.563]
25. Mirahayuni, N. K. (2002). Investigating textual structure in native and non-native English research articles: Strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers University of New South Wales]. Sydney, Australia.
26. Mosher, D. (1998). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural aspects of second-langauge writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 115-116. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263198261055 [DOI:10.1017/S0272263198261055]
27. Susilowati, E., Faridi, A., Sakhiyya, Z. (2022). Thematic structure and thematic progression in research articles published in Scopus-indexed international journals. English Education Journal, 12(1), 55-66. DOI: 10.15294/eej.v12i1.53229 [DOI:10.15294/eej.v12i1.53229]
28. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
29. Swales, J., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written communication, 4(2), 175-191. DOI: 10.1177/0741088387004002004 [DOI:10.1177/0741088387004002004]
30. Whittaker, R. (1995). Theme processes and the realization of meaning in academic articles. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 105-128). Pinter.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |