<>
Volume 8, Issue 2 (5-2025)
JSAL 2025, 8(2): 1-15 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Badpa H, Zare Behtash E. (2025). Assessing Practical General English Textbook: An Analysis of Overall Quality and Intercultural Communicative Competence Attributes [In English]. JSAL. 8(2), 1-15.
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-182-en.html
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-182-en.html
1- Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Languages, Arak University, Arak, Iran , h-badpa.03@phd.araku.ac.ir
2- Department of English, Faculty of Humanities and Management, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran
2- Department of English, Faculty of Humanities and Management, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran
Abstract: (496 Views)
This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of Practical General English, a widely adopted university-level textbook, with a focus on its overall quality and its integration of intercultural communicative competence (ICC) attributes. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research draws on data collected from 30 Iranian university professors specializing in language education. Data were gathered through a 61-item checklist, developed by Lei and Soontornwipast (2020), which assessed two primary dimensions: Overall Quality (22 items) and ICC Attributes (39 items). Additionally, semi-structured interviews with five open-ended questions provided qualitative insights into the textbook’s strengths and limitations. Quantitative findings revealed moderate to high satisfaction among professors, with an overall quality mean score of 3.92 (SD = 0.62) and an ICC attributes mean score of 3.78 (SD = 0.71), based on a 5-point Likert scale. The Practicality theme scored highest (M = 4.05, SD = 0.58), indicating the textbook’s user-friendliness and adaptability, while Teaching Aids (M = 3.72, SD = 0.69) and Activities and Exercises (M = 3.71, SD = 0.70) received lower scores, suggesting deficiencies in supplementary resources and interactive tasks. Statistical analyses, including independent and paired-samples t-tests, showed no significant differences across themes or between dimensions (p > 0.05), indicating consistent perceptions of the textbook’s strengths and weaknesses. Qualitative analysis highlighted the textbook’s robust inclusion of cultural content, such as global festivals and intercultural scenarios, which professors noted fostered cultural awareness and empathy among students. However, recurring critiques highlighted the insufficient technological integration, including the lack of interactive digital tools and multimedia resources, as well as a notable absence of teacher training materials to support ICC-focused instruction. These gaps align with contemporary literature advocating for technology-enhanced learning and educator preparedness to optimize ICC development (Byram et al., 2021; Godwin-Jones, 2022). The study highlights the effectiveness of Practical General English in supporting linguistic proficiency and ICC, but recommends enhancements to digital resources and instructor guidance to maximize its impact. By addressing these areas, the textbook could better prepare students for intercultural interactions in globalized contexts. This research contributes to the broader discourse on language textbook evaluation, offering actionable insights for educators and curriculum designers to refine language education programs and foster ICC in diverse, globalized classroom settings.
Keywords: Language Education, Cross-Cultural Communication Skills, Linguistic Instruction, Functional English
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Language Teaching
Received: 2025/04/9 | Accepted: 2025/05/31 | Published: 2025/05/31
Received: 2025/04/9 | Accepted: 2025/05/31 | Published: 2025/05/31
References
1. Agustin, A., & Wirza, Y. (2020). "Indonesian teachers' perspective towards the use of authentic materials on students' communicative competence in EFL classroom". In Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control (pp. 1-5). DOI: 10.1145/3440084.3441215 [DOI:10.1145/3440084.3441215]
2. Awasthi, J. R. (2006). "Textbook and its evaluation". Journal of Nepal English Language Teachers' Association, 11(1-2), pp.1-10.
3. Byram, M., Golubeva, I., Han, H., Huang, X. (2021). From Principles to Practice in Education for Intercultural Citizenship. Multilingual Matters.
4. Deardorff, D. K. (2020). The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence. Sage Publications.
5. Deardorff, D. K. (2020). Manual for developing intercultural competencies: Story circles. UNESCO. [DOI:10.4324/9780429244612]
6. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. G. (2005). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Garinger, D. (2002). "Textbook selection for the ESL classroom". Center for Applied Linguistics Digest, 2(10), pp. 1-2.
8. Gelfman, E., Podstrigich, A., & Losinskaya, R. (2004). "On the problem of typology and functions of school texts, Discussion Group 14", Focus on the Development and Research of Mathematics Textbooks.
9. Gholami, J., Nikou, F., & Soultanpour, A. (2012). "A retrospective-comparative evaluation of textbooks developed by native and non-native English speakers". Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 2(11), pp. 35-42.
10. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). "Emerging Technologies: Language Learning Technology". Language Learning Technology, 26(2), pp. 1-12.
11. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). "Emerging technologies for language learning". Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), pp. 4-18.
12. Guilloteaux, M. (2013). "Language textbook selection: Using materials analysis from the perspective of SLA principles", Asia-Pacific Edu Res., 22(3), pp. 231-239. [DOI:10.1007/s40299-012-0015-3]
13. Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. London & New York: Longman Inc. [DOI:10.1093/elt/ccn029]
14. Horsley, M. & Sikorova, Z. (2014). "Classroom Teaching and Learning Resources: International Comparisons from TIMSS − A Preliminary Review. Orbis Scholae, 8(2), pp.43−60. DOI: 10.14712/23363177.2015.65. [DOI:10.14712/23363177.2015.65]
15. Horsley, M., Knight, B. & Huntly, H. (2010). "The role of textbooks and other teaching and learning resources in higher education in Australia: Change and continuity in supporting learning". IARTEM e-Journal, 3(2), pp. 43−61.
16. Huber, J. (2021). "The Impact of Intercultural Training on Language Learners' Communication Skills". Journal of Language and Intercultural Communication, 21(3), pp. 345-360.
17. Huber, J. (2021). "Intercultural competence in language education: A review of research". System, 98, 102462.
18. Lee, J. F. K., & Toh, R. Y. (2022). "Student voice in textbook evaluation: A case study". TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), pp. 450-475.
19. Lee, J., Toh, G. (2022). "Engaging Learners in Language Program Evaluation: Perspectives from Students". Language Teaching Research, 26(4), pp. 491-507.
20. Lei, H., Soontornwiapst, P. (2020). "Developing a Checklist for Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence in Language Education Programs". Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), pp. 389-398.
21. Liddicoat, A. J., Scarino, A. (2020). Intercultural Language Teaching and Learning. Wiley-Blackwell. of authentic materials on students' communicative competence in EFL classroom. In Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control (pp. 1-5). DOI: 10.1145/3440084.3441215 [DOI:10.1145/3440084.3441215]
22. McGrath, I. (2006). Teachers' and learners' images for coursebooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/elt/cci104]
23. Razmjoo, S. A., & Jozaghi, Z. (2010). "The representation of multiple intelligences types in the Top-Notch series: A textbook evaluation". Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), pp. 59-84.
24. Razmjoo, S. A., & Jozaghi, Z. (2010). "The representation of multiple intelligences types in the Top-Notch series: A textbook evaluation". Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), pp. 59-84.
25. Riazi, A.M. (2003). What do textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation schemes of three decades. In W.A. Renanda. (Ed.). Methodology and Materials Design in Language Teaching (pp. 52-68). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Center.
26. Shannon, p. (2010). Textbook Development and Selection. International Encyclopedia of Education (3th Edition). [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00065-8]
27. Sheldon, L. (1988). "Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials". ELT Journal, 42(4), pp. 237-246. [DOI:10.1093/elt/42.4.237]
28. Sulistiyo, U., Supiani, S., Kailani, A., & Lestariyana, R. P. D. (2020). "Infusing moral content into primary school English textbooks: A critical discourse analysis". Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 251-260. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL [DOI:10.17509/ijal.v10i1.25067]
29. Tomlinson, B. ed. (2011). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/9781139042789]
30. Wang, X. L., Wan, K., & Zhou, C. H. (2010). "Synthesis of novel sulfanilamide-derived 1, 2, 3-triazoles and their evaluation for antibacterial and antifungal activities". European journal of medicinal chemistry, 45(10), pp. 4631-4639. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.07.031]
31. Waters, A. (2009). "Advances in materials design". In M. H. Long and C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (311-326). Malden, MA: Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781444315783.ch18]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |