<>
Volume 8, Issue 4 (12-2025)
JSAL 2025, 8(4): 69-109 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tajik A, Karkhaneh A. (2025). Exploring the Role of AI-Driven Dynamic Writing Platforms in Improving EFL Learners' Writing Skills and Fostering Their Motivation: An Integrative Study [In English]. JSAL. 8(4), 69-109.
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-196-en.html
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-196-en.html
1- Department of English Translation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Varamin Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran , Tajik.esl.teacher20124@gmail.com
2- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran
2- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran
Abstract: (912 Views)
AI-powered dynamic writing platforms, particularly QuillBot, provide transformative opportunities to enrich English language learning and actively engage students in authentic writing tasks. Nevertheless, the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in enhancing the writing proficiency and motivation of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners has not been systematically explored. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates how QuillBot influences learners’ coherence, vocabulary use, grammatical accuracy, task achievement, and motivational development. Employing a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, the research gathered both quantitative and qualitative data from 65 intermediate EFL students at Islamic Azad University, Varamin–Pishva Branch, during the Fall semester of 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the experimental group integrating QuillBot-assisted writing tasks, and the control group receiving traditional instruction. Quantitative data were sourced from IELTS-based writing tests and validated motivation scales, while qualitative insights were derived from semi-structured interviews that explored learners’ experiences of autonomy, engagement, and confidence. Statistical analysis revealed a moderate-to-large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.76) for QuillBot-enhanced performance, with noticeable gains in lexical sophistication and syntactic accuracy. Thematic analysis identified three recurring patterns: higher self-regulation, reduced anxiety toward writing, and greater creative expression. Collectively, these outcomes confirm that AI-assisted tools can produce measurable progress in writing proficiency while reinforcing sustained motivation among EFL learners. These findings also highlight implications for curriculum design and teacher training, emphasizing the need for professional development programs that prepare educators to integrate AI tools effectively into EFL writing classrooms.
Keywords: AI-driven Writing, Quillbot, Writing skills, Motivation to Write, EFL Learners, Mixed-Methods Study, Technology-Enhanced Language Teaching
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Language Teaching
Received: 2025/07/15 | Accepted: 2025/11/22 | Published: 2025/12/1
Received: 2025/07/15 | Accepted: 2025/11/22 | Published: 2025/12/1
References
1. Ahmed, M., Siddique, M., & Yasmin, T. (2024). "Impact of artificial intelligence-based writing assistant on the academic writing skills of university faculty in Pakistan". International Journal of Human and Society, 4(1), pp. 539-545. DOI: 10.58256/ijhs.v4i1.423
2. Amanda, A., Sukma, E. M., Lubis, N., & Dewi, U. (2023). "Quillbot as an AI-powered English writing assistant: An alternative for students to write English", Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra Inggris, 3(2), pp.188-199. DOI: 10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.2026 [DOI:10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.2026]
3. Amyatun, R. L., & Kholis, A. (2023). "Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) like QuillBot AI assist students' writing skills? Assisting learning to write texts using AI" ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 3(2), 135-154. DOI: 10.22515/elereviews.v3i2.7533 [DOI:10.22515/elereviews.v3i2.7533]
4. Araujo, T., & Bol, N. (2024). "From speaking like a person to being personal: The effects of personalized, regular interactions with conversational agents", Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100030 [DOI:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100030]
5. Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2015). "A conversational agent to encourage willingness to communicate in the context of English as a foreign language", Procedia Computer Science, 60, pp.1433-1442. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.219 [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.219]
6. Bhutoria, A. (2022). "Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model", Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068 [DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068]
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/13620-004 [DOI:10.1037/13620-004]
8. Carayannopoulos, S. (2018). "Using chatbots to aid the transition", The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(2), pp. 118-129. DOI: 10.1108/IJILT-10-2017-0097 [DOI:10.1108/IJILT-10-2017-0097]
9. Chaisiri, P. (2023). "Promoting Thai EFL learners' willingness to communicate in the virtual classroom through technology-mediated oral tasks", LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), pp. 97-120. DOI: 10.32890/learn.2023.16.1.7
10. Chang, T. S., Li, Y., Huang, H. W., & Whitfield, B. (2021). "Exploring EFL undergraduates' writing performance and their acceptance of AI-based automated writing feedback", In 2021 2nd International Conference on Education Development and Studies (pp. 31-35). DOI: 10.1145/3459043.3459065 [DOI:10.1145/3459043.3459065]
11. Cahyono, B. Y., Khotimah, K., & Batunan, D. A. (2023). "Workable approaches in EFL teaching mediated by mobile technology during the pandemic and post-pandemic: Indonesian EFL teachers' experiences and expectations". Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, pp. 138-159. http://callej.org/journal/24-1/Cahyono-Khotimah-Batunan-Imamyartha2023.pdf
12. Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(July). [DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002]
13. Dogan, M. E., Goru Dogan, T., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). "The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in online learning and distance education processes: A systematic review of empirical studies". Applied Sciences, 13(5), Article 3056. DOI: 10.3390/app13053056 [DOI:10.3390/app13053056]
14. Duncan, A., & Joyner, D. (2022). "On the necessity (or lack thereof) of digital proctoring: Drawbacks, perceptions, and alternatives", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), pp. 1482-1496. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12700 [DOI:10.1111/jcal.12700]
15. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.
16. Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). "A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 [DOI:10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846]
17. Fathi, J., Derakhshan, A., & Safdari, M. (2020). "The impact of portfolio-based writing instruction on writing performance and anxiety of EFL" students. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 51(3), pp. 226-235. DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2020.134729 [DOI:10.24425/ppb.2020.134729]
18. Fitriani, F. (2024). "AI platforms in EFL education: Insights from higher education students in Smart Society 5.0", ANCOLT: International Proceeding on Language Teaching, 1(1), pp. 407-418.
19. Fitria, T. N. (2022). "Avoiding plagiarism of students' scientific writing by using the QuillBot paraphraser", Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 4(3), pp. 252-262. DOI: 10.31849/elsya.v4i3.9917 [DOI:10.31849/elsya.v4i3.9917]
20. Freiermuth, M. R. (2020). "Introduction and overview: The inescapable confluence of technology, psychology, and second language learners and users". In M. R. Freiermuth & N. Zarrinabadi (Eds.), Technology and the psychology of second language learners and users (pp. 3-32). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34212-8 [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-34212-8]
21. Fryer, L., & Carpenter, R. (2006). "Emerging technologies: Bots as language learning tools", Language, Learning and Technology, 10(3), pp. 8-14. http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/emerging/ [DOI:10.64152/10125/44068]
22. Fryer, L. K., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R., & Lăpușneanu, D. (2020). "Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions", Language, Learning and Technology, 24(2), pp. 8-22. DOI: 10.125/44719 [DOI:10.64152/10125/44719]
23. Garlinska, M., Osial, M., Proniewska, K., & Pregowska, A. (2023). "The influence of emerging technologies on distance education". Electronics, 12(7), 1550. DOI: 10.3390/electronics12071550 [DOI:10.3390/electronics12071550]
24. Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). "Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students' argumentation skills and task motivation", Computers & Education. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862 [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862]
25. Guo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). "Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence application on EFL students' academic engagement and emotional experiences: A mixed-methods study", European Journal of Education. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12812 [DOI:10.1111/ejed.12812]
26. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). "An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges", BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(4), 100089. DOI: 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089 [DOI:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089]
27. Henkel, A. P., Bromuri, S., Iren, D., & Urovi, V. (2020). Half human, half machine: Augmenting service employees with AI for interpersonal emotion regulation. Journal of Service Management, 31(2), pp. 247-265. DOI: 10.1108/JOSM-05-2019-0160 [DOI:10.1108/JOSM-05-2019-0160]
28. Hsu, M. H., Chen, P. S., & Yu, C. S. (2021). Proposing a task-oriented chatbot system for EFL learners' speaking practice. Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1960864 [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2021.1960864]
29. Hsu, T. C., Chang, C., & Jen, T. H. (2023). "Artificial intelligence image recognition using self-regulation learning strategies: Effects on vocabulary acquisition, learning anxiety, and learning behaviors of English language learners". Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2165508 [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2023.2165508]
30. Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). "Chatbots for language learning-Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), pp. 237-257. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12610 [DOI:10.1111/jcal.12610]
31. Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). "Trends, research issues, and applications of artificial intelligence in language education", Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), pp. 112-131.
32. Jeanjaroonsri, R. (2023). "Thai EFL learners' use and perceptions of mobile technologies for writing". LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), pp. 169-193. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/263438
33. Jhajj, K. S., Jindal, P., & Kaur, K. (2024). "Use of artificial intelligence tools for research by medical students: A narrative review", Cureus, 16(3). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55367 [DOI:10.7759/cureus.55367]
34. Jeon, J. (2021). Chatbot-assisted dynamic assessment (CA-DA) for L2 vocabulary learning and diagnosis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, pp. 1-27. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1987272 [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2021.1987272]
35. Jeon, J. (2022). "Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: Young learners' experiences and perspectives". Computer Assisted Language Learning, pp. 1-26. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241 [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241]
36. Karataş, F., Abedi, F. Y., Günyel, F. O., Karadeniz, D., & Kuzgun, Y. (2024b). "Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT's effect on foreign language learners", Education and Information Technologies. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6 [DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6]
37. Kessler, G. (2018). "Technology and the future of language teaching", Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), pp. 205-218. DOI: 10.1111/flan.12318 [DOI:10.1111/flan.12318]
38. Khabib, S. (2022). "Introducing artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital writing assistants for teachers in writing scientific articles", Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 1(2), pp. 114-124. DOI: 10.12928/tefl.v1i2.249 [DOI:10.12928/tefl.v1i2.249]
39. Kim, N. Y. (2016). "Effects of voice chat on EFL learners' speaking ability according to proficiency levels", Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 19(4), pp. 63-88.
40. Kim, H. S., Cha, Y., & Kim, N. Y. (2020). "Impact of mobile interactions with AI on writing performance", Modern English Education, 21(2), pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.18095/meeso.2020.21.2.1 [DOI:10.18095/meeso.2020.21.2.1]
41. Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). "Post-graduate students' perceptions of Quillbot utilization in English academic writing class". Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), pp. 437-451. DOI: 10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852 [DOI:10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852]
42. Lam, R., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Using digital portfolios to develop students' writing: A practical guide for language teachers. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9781003295860 [DOI:10.4324/9781003295860]
43. Lee, J. S. (2019). "EFL students' views of willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), pp. 692-712. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509 [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2018.1535509]
44. Li, Q., & Chan, K. K. (2024). "Test takers' attitudes of using exam-oriented mobile application as a tool to adapt in a high-stakes speaking test", Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), pp. 219-237. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-12297-0 [DOI:10.1007/s10639-023-12297-0]
45. Liu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y. F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). "Incorporating reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments", Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1-19). DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.20128
46. Liu, G. Z., Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2023). "Enhancing EFL learners' intercultural communicative effectiveness through telecollaboration with native and non-native speakers of English", Computer Assisted Language Learning, pp. 1-31. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2022.2164778 [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2022.2164778]
47. Lu, C. H., Chiou, G. F., Day, M. Y., Ong, C. S., & Hsu, W. L. (2006). "Using instant messaging to provide an intelligent learning environment", In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 575-583). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/11774303_57 [DOI:10.1007/11774303_57]
48. Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). "ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), pp. 570-581. [DOI:10.1002/asi.24750]
49. Mhlanga, D. (2023). "Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning", In FinTech and artificial intelligence for sustainable development: The role of smart technologies in achieving development goals (pp. 387-409). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25285-7_20 [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-37776-1_17]
50. Men, L. R., Zhou, A., & Sunny Tsai, W. H. (2022). "Harnessing the power of Chatbot social conversation for organizational listening: The impact on perceived transparency and organization-public relationships", Journal of Public Relations Research, 34(1-2), pp. 20-44. DOI: 10.1080/1062726X.2022.2068553 [DOI:10.1080/1062726X.2022.2068553]
51. Mogavi, R. H., Deng, C., Kim, J. J., Zhou, P., Kwon, Y. D., Metwally, A. H. S., ... & Hui, P. (2024). "ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters' utilization and perceptions", Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100027. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027 [DOI:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027]
52. Mozumder, M. A. I., Athar, A., Armand, T. P. T., Sheeraz, M. M., Uddin, S. M. I., & Kim, H. C. (2023, February). "Technological roadmap of the future trend of metaverse based on IoT, blockchain, and AI techniques in metaverse education", In 2023 25th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) (pp. 1414-1423). IEEE. DOI: 10.23919/ICACT56868.2023.10079464 [DOI:10.23919/ICACT56868.2023.10079464]
53. Nykyporets, S. S. (2023). "Harnessing cloud technologies for foreign language acquisition among masters in energy engineering", Moderní aspekty vědy: Svazek XXXI mezinárodní, pp. 21-56. http://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/37121
54. Peng, J. (2015). "L2 motivational self-system, attitudes, and affect as predictors of L2 WTC: An imagined community perspective". The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), pp. 433-443. DOI: 10.1007/s40299-014-0195-0 [DOI:10.1007/s40299-014-0195-0]
55. Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023). "Exploring relationship development with social Chatbots: A mixed-method study of replica". Computers in Human Behavior, 140, Article 107600. DPI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600 [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600]
56. Qadir, J. (2022). "Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education", TechRxiv. Preprint. [DOI:10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1]
57. Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2023). "Using artificial intelligence to foster students' writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: A case of Word-Tune application", Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170 [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170]
58. Rakhmanina, L., & Serasi, R. (2022). UTILIZING QUILLBOT PARAPHRASER TO MINIMIZE PLAGIARISM IN STUDENTS' SCIENTIFIC WRITING. Novateur Publications, pp. 26-33.
59. Silitonga, L. M., Hawanti, S., Aziez, F., Furqon, M., Zain, D. S. M., Anjarani, S., & Wu, T. T. (2023). "The impact of AI chatbot-based learning on students' motivation in English writing classroom", In International conference on innovative technologies and learning (pp. 542-549). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_53 [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_53]
60. Tai, T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2020). "The impact of Google Assistant on adolescent EFL learners' willingness to communicate". Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1841801 [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2020.1841801]
61. Tajik, A. (2025). Gamified and non-gamified AI tools in enhancing EFL listening comprehension: An analysis of Duolingo and Replika's impact on engagement, motivation, and learning outcomes [Preprint]. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6032009/v1 [DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6032009/v1]
62. Tajik, A. (2025). Exploring the role of AI-driven dynamic writing platforms in improving EFL learners' writing skills and fostering their motivation [Preprint]. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5788599/v1 [DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5788599/v1]
63. Tajik, A. (2025). Beyond Voice Recognition: Integrating Alexa's Emotional Intelligence and ChatGPT's Language Processing for EFL Learners' Development and Anxiety Reduction Comparative Analysis [Preprint]. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5989702/v1 [DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5989702/v1]
64. Tambunan, A. R. S., Andayani, W., Sari, W. S., & Lubis, F. K. (2022). Investigating EFL students' linguistic problems using Grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback. [DOI:10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46428]
65. Timpe-Laughlin, V., Sydorenko, T., & Daurio, P. (2020). "Using spoken dialogue technology for L2 speaking practice: What do teachers think?", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5-6), pp. 1194-1217. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1774904 [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2020.1774904]
66. Umamah, A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2022). "EFL university students' use of online resources to facilitate self-regulated writing". Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), pp. 108-124. http://callej.org/journal/23-1/Umamah-Cahyono2022.pdf
67. Underwood, J. (2017). "Exploring AI language assistants with primary EFL students", In K. Borthwick, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL in a climate of change: Adapting to turbulent global conditions-Short papers from EUROCALL 2017 (pp. 317-321). Research Publishing.net. DOI: 10.14705/rpnet.2017.eurocall2017.733 [DOI:10.14705/rpnet.2017.eurocall2017.733]
68. Vladova, G., Ullrich, A., Bender, B., & Gronau, N. (2021). "Students' acceptance of technology-mediated teaching-How it was influenced during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: A study from Germany", Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 636086. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086]
69. Walker, A., & White, G. (2013). Technology enhanced language learning: Connecting theory and practice-Oxford handbooks for language teachers. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/elt/cct069 [DOI:10.1093/elt/cct069]
70. Wang, C., Li, Z., & Bonk, C. (2024). "Understanding self-directed learning in AI-assisted writing: A mixed methods study of postsecondary learners", Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100247. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100247 [DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100247]
71. Wang, Z. (2022). "Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case from a college reading and writing course", Library Hi Tech, 40(1), pp. 80-97. DOI: 10.1108/lht-05-2020-0113 [DOI:10.1108/LHT-05-2020-0113]
72. Wei, L. (2023). "Artificial intelligence in language instruction: Impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning", Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1261955. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955]
73. Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Suwanwihok, K., Jinowat, N., & Muenjanchoey, R. (2024). "Synergizing collaborative writing and AI feedback: An investigation into enhancing L2 writing proficiency in wiki-based environments", Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100228. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228 [DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228]
74. Wu, W.-C. V., Chen Hsieh, J. S., & Yang, J. C. (2017). "Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners' oral proficiency", Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), pp. 142-157. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002170
75. Wu, W., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Liu, H. (2022). "Exploring factors of the willingness to accept AI-assisted learning environments: An empirical investigation based on the UTAUT model and perceived risk theory", Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 870777. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870777 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870777]
76. Xuyen, N. T. (2023). "Using the online paraphrasing tool Quillbot to assist students in paraphrasing the source information: English-majored students' perceptions". In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 21-27). AIJR Proceedings. DOI: 10.21467/proceedings.150.3 [DOI:10.21467/proceedings.150.3]
77. Yang, H., Kim, H., Lee, J. H., & Shin, D. (2022). "Implementation of an AI chatbot as an English conversation partner in EFL speaking classes". ReCALL, 34(3), pp. 327-343. DOI: 10.1017/S0958344022000039 [DOI:10.1017/S0958344022000039]
78. Yanguas, I. (2010). "Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It's about time", Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), pp. 72-93. DOI: 10.17507/tpls.1002.01 [DOI:10.17507/tpls.1002.01]
79. Yashima, T. (2009). "International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context". In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 144-163). Multilingual Matters. DOI: 10.21832/9781847691293-008 [DOI:10.21832/9781847691293-008]
80. Zhao, X. (2022). "Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing Wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL writers". RELC Journal. DOI: 10.1177/00336882221094089 [DOI:10.1177/00336882221094089]
81. Zhao, D. (2024). "The impact of AI-enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: An analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation", Education and Information Technologies, 1-32. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-024-13145-5 [DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-13145-5]
82. Zhou, T., Cao, S., Zhou, S., Zhang, Y., & He, A. (2023). "Chinese intermediate English learners outdid ChatGPT in deep cohesion: Evidence from English narrative writing", System. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2023.103141 [DOI:10.1016/j.system.2023.103141]
83. Zou, B., Lyu, Q., Han, Y., Li, Z., & Zhang, W. (2023). "Exploring students' acceptance of an artificial intelligence speech evaluation program for EFL speaking practice: An application of the integrated model of technology acceptance", Computer-Assisted Language Learning. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2023.2278608 [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2023.2278608]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |