Volume 7, Issue 2 (Journal of Studies in Applied Language (JSAL) 2024)                   JSAL 2024, 7(2): 27-56 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moeini F, Iraji M, Kazemi F. (2024). Comparison of the Learning Process of Prepositions from the Perspective of the Radial Network in Children of Age Groups A and B [In Persian]. JSAL. 7(2), 27-56.
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-132-en.html
1- PhD Student of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , Miraji180@gmail.com
3- Associate Professor of Linguistics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (293 Views)
One of the topics raised in cognitive linguistics is the topic of radial network. The purpose of this study aimed to comparison of the learning process of prepositions (from, in, to and with) from the perspective of the radial network in children of age group A and B by the theory of stages of child development and language learning. In should be mentioned that the radial network has not been sufficiently focused on by cognitive linguistics. The results of this research can have a great impact on children's fiction literature and fiction writers in the field of children can use the results of this research. The present study was descriptive _analytical in the theoretical framework of cognitive semantics. The statistical population includes 40 children from 2 and 9 years. To collect the data, children's natural speech was used the field method (Instagram videos). The research results show that the preposition "to" with the meaning of addressing someone has the highest frequency in age groups A and B. From the point of view of Bruner's cognitive theory, children in age group A are in the stage of movement and image representation and in age group B are in the stage of symbolic representation. A radial network is a term used to describe a collection of words that are interconnected through their meanings, concepts, and expressions. These words possess multiple definitions and are categorically related radially. Within this framework, a single meaning is designated as the primary or archetypal meaning, while alternative meanings are situated around it, akin to rays radiating out from a central, exemplary core.
Full-Text [PDF 718 kb]   (174 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Linguistic research
Received: 2024/05/1 | Accepted: 2024/05/30 | Published: 2024/06/15

References
1. Anvri, H., (2003). The great culture of Sokhan. Tehran: Sokhan Publications. [In Persian]
2. Afkhami, A., & Asghari, S. Z. (2012). "A Survey on Emerging Non-Spatial Senses From the Spatial Sense of "Dar" Based on LCCM Theory". ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 4(7), pp. 27-48. DOI: 10.22051/jlr.2013.1002
3. Badamdari Z, Elyasi M. (2021) "Teaching concrete and abstract concepts of prepositions "in" to Persian speakers and "dar" to non-Persian speakers: A Study in the Framework of Cognitive Semantics". LRR; 12 (2): pp. 35-64. DOI: 10.29252/LRR.12.2.2
4. Rasekh Mohannad, M., (2014). An introduction to cognitive linguistics: theories and concepts. Tehran: Sokhan Publications. [In Persian]
5. Razi Nejad, M., Mona, F., (2021). "Investigation of the semantic network of the preposition "to" in the framework of cognitive semantics". Shahyar Research, 8(31), pp. 925-942.
6. Razi Nejad, M., Tawheed, S., (2019). "Investigation of the semantic network of the Persian preposition "pish" in the framework of cognitive semantics". The second national humanities and development conference in Shiraz, https://Civilica.com/doc/1183971
7. Zahedi, K., Mohammadi, A,. (2011) "Semantic Network of a Modern Persian Preposition: "Az" in a Cognitive Semantic Framework". Advances in Cognitive Sciences; 13(1), pp. 67-80
8. Golfam, A., Assi, M., Agha Golzadeh, F., & Yousefi Rad, F. (2009). "The Analysis of Persian Preposition /az/ within the framework of Cognitive Semantics and Comparing it with the Traditional Approach". Language and Linguistics, 5(10), pp. 69-80.
9. Golfam, A., & Yousefi Rad, F. (2010). "A Cognitive Semantic Approach to Persian Spatial Prepositions, a Pedagogical Perspective, Case Study: Persian Preposition /dar/". Research in Contemporary World Literature, 14(56), pp. 167-179.
10. Meshkinfam, B., & Dehghani, A. (2019). "Cognitive study of semantic network of the letter "Thumma" in the Holy Quran". Linguistic Research in the Holy Quran, 7(2), pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.22108/nrgs.2018.110494.1250
11. Nouri, Nasim (2019), "Characteristics of 2-year-old children", article collection 2, http://drnasimnouri.com
12. Valizade S, Mahmoodi Bakhtiari B, Fallahi M H, Faham M. Comprehension and production of spatial and non-spatial prepositions in specific language impairment children versus healthy children Based on cognitive linguistics. Advances in Cognitive Sciences 2020; 21(4): pp. 103-112, DOI: 10.30699/icss.21.4.103 [DOI:10.30699/icss.21.4.103]
13. Abdalla, I. (2021). "Difficultes in using correct English prepositions among EFL students". JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(2). [DOI:10.21070/jees.v6i2.1640]
14. Brugman, C. (1980). The study of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland. [In English]
15. Brugman, C.,& lakoff, G. (1988). "Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks". Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspective from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Artificial Intelligence. Steven, S. Garrison, W, Cottrell.,& Michael, K. Tanehaus(eds.). San Mateo. Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 477-508. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-051013-2.50022-7]
16. Bruner, J. (1995). "The Cognitive revolution in children's understanding of mind". http://psycnet.apa.org.
17. Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction: Edinburgh University Press. [In English]
18. Fahmi, Aajami, R. (2022). "A cognitive linguistic study of the English prepositions above, on and over". Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 18(1), pp. 738-751. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.216
19. Geeraerts, k. (1986). Theories of lexical Semantics. Safavi, K. [Safavi K]. Tehran: Scientific publication. [In English]
20. Heine, B. Claudi, U.,& Hunnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual framework. Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
21. Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [In English]
22. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press. [In English]
23. Lakoff, G. (1987). Woman, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001]
24. Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.18. [In English]
25. Mustaqim, M. Arifin, Z. Mukit, A.,& Kholik, A. (2023). "Analysis of the meanings of prepositions in Surat Al-Sajadah". Dzil Majaz: Journal of Arabic Literature, 1(1), pp. 41-52. DOI: 10.58223/dzilmajaz.v1i1.23 [DOI:10.58223/dzilmajaz.v1i1.23]
26. Piaget, J. (2000). "Piaget's theory of cognitive development". Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings, 2, pp. 33-47.
27. Tchizmarova, I, K. (2006). "A Cognitive Linguistics Analysis Of the Bulgarian Verbal Prefixes". Retrieved from: http://seelrc.org.
28. Tchizmarova, I, K. (2012). "A Cognitive Linguistics Analysis Of the Bulgarian Verbal prefixes". Jezitoslovle, pp. 219-260.
29. Tomasello, M. (2009). "Cognitive Linguistics. In M. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds)", A companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, pp. 477-487. [DOI:10.1002/9781405164535.ch37]
30. Tyler, A.,& Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English English prepositions:Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [In English] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511486517]
31. Yule, G. Yanz, J.,& Tsuda, A. (1985). "Investigating aspects of the language learner's confidence: An application of the theory of signal detection". Language Learning, 35(3), pp. 473-488. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01088.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01088.x]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.