Volume 6, Issue 3 (Journal of Studies in Applied Language (JSAL) 2023)                   JSAL 2023, 6(3): 115-133 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mousavi F, Fereidoni J, Cheraghian S. (2023). The study of dropping out and its correlation with the absence and gender in UACECR English language learners [In Persian]. JSAL. 6(3), 115-133. doi:10.61186/jsal.6.3.115
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-95-en.html
1- PhD student in Linguistics, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran , farzaneh_mousavi@atu.ac.ir
2- Assistant Professor of the Language Department of the University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
3- Master of Mechatronics, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran
Abstract:   (1177 Views)
An important issue in learning a second language is to withdraw from learning the second language which affects directly the learning quality and arriving at educational objectives and its adverse consequences have been always aimed at language learners. Therefore, studying the effective factors in this social complex issue to take appropriate prohibitory strategies seems necessary. The statistical population of this study constitutes of 800 language learners of UACECR. The volume of the statistical sample was considered 261 persons using Morgan Table and with a 95% confidence coefficient. After arranging the statistical population based on the total score and given the provided categorization in this article, 261 statistical samples were selected with a simple random method from the first, third, and fourth quarters. The samples were composed of 12 to 18 years old boy and girl learners at the elementary level. The effect of the "gender" factor was studied in addition to the correlation between "absence" and "withdrawal of learning" factors. For this purpose, the samples were separated into two groups "the language learners with a total score higher than 90" and "the language learners with a total score lower than 80". The study's assumptions were studied using the chi-square test at SPSS V.24 software. The results of obtained data analysis indicated that the total absence coefficient of the boys is 123.2% which is 15.1% higher than the total girls. It is worth noting that girls in the diligent group absented 26.8% less, and the girls in the less diligent group absented 10.6% more compared to their boys' counterpart group. Meanwhile, the less diligent boys and girls absented 48% and 10.6% more compared to their same gender in the diligent group. The relative percentage indicated the learning withdrawal of the studied groups to the total complex. As indicated 19.95 of the girls in the studied population withdraw from learning the language in the next term of which 27.6% were related to the less diligent group and 47.4% were related to the diligent boys' group.  The coefficient of absence and learning withdrawal were significantly correlated with  0.048 and 0.011 respectively for diligent and less diligent groups at a 5% level. No significant correlation was seen among other variables at the 5% level. It can be also said that although according to structural strain theory, totally boys are more subjected to language learning withdrawal, this is completely reversed in the "less diligent" girl group. In other words, this group of girl language learners even withdraw more compared to their boy counterparts. Finally, it seems that the "absence" variable can be considered an appropriate factor to predict language learning withdrawal of English learners.
Full-Text [PDF 421 kb]   (867 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Language Teaching
Received: 2022/04/24 | Accepted: 2023/03/7 | Published: 2023/07/30

References
1. Bachman, J., jerald, G. (1972). "Dropouts are losers, says who?", Today's Education, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 26-31.
2. Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M. D., Abbott, R. D., Hill, K. G., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (2000). "Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories", Journal of Educational Psychology, No. 92, No. 3, pp. 568-582. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.568. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.568]
3. Becker, B. (2010). Wer profitiert mehr vom kindergarten? Die wirkung der kindergartenbesuchsdauer und ausstattungsqualität auf die entwicklung des deutschen wortschatzes bei deutschen und türkischen kindern [Who profits more from preschool attendance? The impact of time in preschool and quality of preschool environment on the development of German and Turkish children's German vocabulary]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Vol. 62, No, 1, pp. 139-163. Doi:10.1007/s11577-010-0090-5 [DOI:10.1007/s11577-010-0090-5]
4. Cambridge University. (2021). Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 2th edition. Cambridge: University Press.
5. Chen, J., Lin, T. F. (2008). "Class attendance and exam performance: A randomized experiment", The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 213-227. Doi: 10.3200/JECE.39.3.213-227 [DOI:10.3200/JECE.39.3.213-227]
6. Clump, M. A., Bauer, H & Whiteleather, A. (2003). "To attend or not to attend: Is that a good question?", Journal of Instructional Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 220-239.
7. Condelli, L., Wrigley, H., Yoon, S., Cronen, S & Seburn, M. (2010). Final report: What Works study for adult ESL literacy students. Washington, DC: Planning and Evaluation Service, U.S. Department of Education.
8. Credé, M., Roch, S. G & Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college a meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 272-295. Doi: 10.3102/0034654310362998 [DOI:10.3102/0034654310362998]
9. Durden, G. C & Ellis, L. V. (1995). "The Effects of Attendance on Student Learning in Principles of Economics", American Economic Review, Vol. 85, pp. 343-346.
10. Fay, R.E., Villafañe R.A & Gash, P. (2013). "Absenteeism and Language Learning: Does Missing Class Matter?", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 1184-1190. Doi: Doi:10.4304/jltr.4.6.1184-1190 [DOI:10.4304/jltr.4.6.1184-1190]
11. Finn, J. D. (1989). "Withdrawing from school", Review of Educational Research, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 117-142. Doi: 10.3102/00346543059002117 [DOI:10.3102/00346543059002117]
12. Friedman, P., Rodriguez, F & McComb, J. (2001). "Why students do and do not attend classes: Myths and realities", College Teaching, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 124-133. [DOI:10.1080/87567555.2001.10844593]
13. Fuller, R. (1927). Fourteen is too early: Some psychological aspects of school-leaving and child labor, New York: National Child Labor Committee.
14. García, Emma., Weiss, Elaine. (2018). "Student absenteeism; Who misses school and how missing school matters for performance", Economic Policy institute, No. 44, pp.10-32.
15. Gubbels, J., van der Put, C. E & Assink, M. (2019). "Risk Factors for School Absenteeism and Dropout: A Meta-Analytic Review", Journal of youth and adolescence, Vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 1637-1667. Doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01072-5 [DOI:10.1007/s10964-019-01072-5]
16. Gump, S. E. (2004). "Keep students coming by keeping them interested: Motivators for class attendance", College Student Journal, No. 38, pp. 157-160.
17. Hannon, L. (2003). "Poverty, delinquency, and educational attainment: Cumulative disadvantage or disadvantage saturation?" Sociological inquiry, Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 575-594. Doi: 10.1111/1475-682X.00072 [DOI:10.1111/1475-682X.00072]
18. Janosz, M., LeBlanc, M., Boulerice, B & Tremblay, R. E. (1997). "Disentangling the weight of school dropout predictors: A test on two longitudinal samples", Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 733- 762. Doi: 10.1023/A:1022300826371 [DOI:10.1023/A:1022300826371]
19. Marburger, R. (2001). "Absenteeism and undergraduate exam performance", Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 99-110 .Doi: 10.2307/1183486 [DOI:10.2307/1183486]
20. Marburger, R. (2006). "Does mandatory attendance improve student performance?", Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 148-155. Doi: 10.3200/JECE.37.2.148-155 [DOI:10.3200/JECE.37.2.148-155]
21. McFarland, J., Cui, J., Holmes, J & Wang, X. (2020). Dropout rates in the United States. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.
22. MEQ, Ministère de l'éducation des Loisirs et du Sport. (2021). Dropping out of school, Quebec: Ministry of Education of Quebec.
23. Moayeri, M., (1991). Education problems. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications.
24. Rumberger, R.W. & Larson, K.A. (1998). "Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout", American Journal of Education, Vol. 10, pp. 10-35. Doi: 10.1086/444201 [DOI:10.1086/444201]
25. Rumberger, R. W. & Sun, A. L. (2008). Why Students Drop Out of School: A Review of 25 Years of Research. University of California. Santa Barbara.
26. Rumberger, R. W. (1987). "High school dropouts: A review of issues and evidence", Review of Educational Research, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 101-121. Doi: 10.3102/00346543057002101 [DOI:10.3102/00346543057002101]
27. Moayeri, M. (1991). Education issues. Tehran: Amirkabir publications. [In Persian].
28. Varzeshi, R. (2009). The effect of class attendance and gender on the success of Payame Noor University undergraduate students in the general language courses. Master's thesis, Payame Noor University. [In Persian].
29. Varzeshi, R., Jafari Gohar, M., Hesami, G., (2009). The effect of class attendance and gender on the success of Payam Noor students in the general language course of the undergraduate level, Tehran: Payam Noor University. [In Persian].

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.