Volume 9, Issue 1 (3-2026)                   JSAL 2026, 9(1): 75-100 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farhani M. (2026). The Linguistic Representation of the Icarus Archetype in the Poetry of Jabra Ibrahim Jabra: A Jungian Reading [In Persian]. JSAL. 9(1), 75-100.
URL: http://jsal.ierf.ir/article-1-249-en.html
Assistant Professor and Faculty Member, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Velayat University of Iranshahr, Iran , m.farhani@velayat.ar.ir
Abstract:   (1068 Views)

Myth in modern Arabic poetry is not merely a narrative or intertextual reference; rather, through the linguistic organization of the text, it becomes a mechanism for representing individual and collective experiences. Despite numerous studies on the symbolic and mythic functions in modern Arabic poetry, as well as Jungian readings of mythological figures, the formation of Icarus as a poetic figure through the linguistic mechanisms of Jabra Ibrahim Jabra’s poetry has received limited independent attention. The central question of this study is how Jabra, through lexical networks, semantic oppositions, syntactic structures, and patterns of repetition, transforms Icarus from the errant adolescent of the classical narrative into a self-aware, resistant, and responsible subject in modern poetry. The originality of this study lies in combining a Jungian archetypal reading with a structural-semantic analysis of poetic language, while simultaneously examining Icarus’s individuation process across five dimensions: actional, spatial, corporeal, existential, and social. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical method, the study demonstrates that the repetition of the phrase “you emerged from the cellars” and the prominence of motion verbs construct ascent as a voluntary act and as the beginning of the “call to adventure.” The collocation of the words “leap” and “rebelliously” further elevates bodily movement into an act of resistance. The opposition between “labyrinth” and “sea,” together with the negation of chains, guns, prisons, and gallows, represents a transition from confinement and repression to relative openness at the level of lexical fields. Moreover, the images of “soft limbs” and “wounds” materialize the archetype of the wounded hero, while propositions denying immortality transform death from a physical defeat into a “symbolic death” and a stage of consciousness within the process of individuation. The study concludes that Icarus’s death in Jabra’s poetry does not mark the end of the hero’s journey; rather, through a shift from the individual to the collective pronoun and the expansion of the acoustic field of “cry,” it culminates in his symbolic return as a collective consciousness and voice. Thus, the language of Jabra’s poetry transforms the myth of Icarus from a fixed narrative into a dynamic model for representing modern humanity.

Full-Text [PDF 640 kb]   (77 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Linguistic research
Received: 2025/11/13 | Accepted: 2025/12/31 | Published: 2026/01/30

References
1. Azzām, M. (n.d.). Al-usṭūrah fī al-shiʿr al-Sūrī al-muʿāṣir [Myth in contemporary Syrian poetry]. Al-Mawqif al-Adabī, General :union: of Arab Writers. [In Arabic]
2. Bahār, M. (2012). Pazhūheshī dar asāṭīr-e Īrān [A study of Iranian myths], 9 th edition, Āgāh. [In Persian]
3. Dehkhodā, A.-A. (1994). Loghatnāmeh-ye Dehkhodā [Dehkhoda Dictionary] (J. Shahīdī & M. Moʿīn, Eds.). Rūzaneh. [In Persian]
4. Eliade, M. (2012). Asṭūreh va vāqeʿiyyat [Myth and reality] (M. Ṣāleḥī ʿAllāmeh, Trans.). Pārseh. [In Persian]
5. al-Faqs, R. (2008). Al-tanāṣṣ fī al-shiʿr al-ʿArabī [Intertextuality in Arabic poetry], 1 th edition, Jawdat Ibrāhīm. [In Arabic]
6. Frye, N. (1999). Taḥlīl-e naqd [Anatomy of criticism] (S. Ḥoseynī, Trans.). Nīlūfar. [In Persian]
7. al-ʿAmmārī, F. ibn ʿA. (2001). Al-usṭūrah wa al-majhūl [Myth and the unknown]. Ḥawliyyāt al-Ādāb wa al-ʿUlūm al-Ijtimāʿiyyah, (21).
8. Gharbāl, M. S. (1965). Al-mawsūʿah al-ʿArabiyyah al-muyassarah [The concise Arabic encyclopedia]. Dār al-Shaʿb. [In Arabic]
9. Ghunaym, Gh. (2008). Al-usṭūrah wa al-ḥikāyah al-shaʿbiyyah fī al-shiʿr al-Filasṭīnī al-ḥadīth wa al-muʿāṣir [Myth and folktale in modern and contemporary Palestinian poetry]. Dār al-ʿĀydī. [In Arabic]
10. Ismāʿīlpūr-Moṭlaq, M., & Sattārī, J. (2001). Asṭūreh va namād dar adabiyyāt [Myth and symbol in literature]. Nashr-e Cheshmeh. [In Persian]
11. Jabra, I. J. (1990). Al-majmūʿāt al-shiʿriyyah [Collected poems], 1 th edition, Al-Rayyis lil-Kutub wa al-Nashr. [In Arabic]
12. Jaʿfarī, M. V. (2010). "Asṭūreh dar shiʿr-e ʿArab" [Myth in Arabic poetry]. Faṣlnāmeh-ye Adabiyyāt-e Fārsī, 6(15), pp. 67-86.
13. Jaʿfarī, M. V. (2011). "Al-usṭūrah wa tajalliyātuhā fī shiʿr-e Akhavān-e Sāles" [Myth and its manifestations in Akhavan Sales's poetry]. Dāneshnāmeh, (3), pp. 187-193.
14. Jung, C. G., & von Franz, M.-L. (2005). Ensān va sembol-hāyesh [Man and his symbols] (M. Solṭāniyeh, Trans.). Jāmī. [In Persian]
15. Kāzemzādeh, A., Pāshāyī, M., & Ḥadīdī, M. (2023). "Marāteb-e kamāl-gerāyī dar Balūhar va Būdhāsaf bar asās-e naẓariyyeh-ye Jung" [Levels of perfectionism in Baluhar and Budhasaf based on Jungian theory]. Pazhūheshnāmeh-ye Adabiyyāt-e Taʿlīmī, 15(57), pp. 84-111.
16. Khālid, O. Y. (2014). "Al-usṭūrah wa waẓāʾifuhā fī dīwān ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Bayātī" [Myth and its functions in the poetry collection of Abd al-Wahhab Al-Bayati]. Dirāsāt fī al-Lughah al-ʿArabiyyah wa Ādābihā, (16), pp. 127-158.
17. Lukács, G. (2001). Naẓariyyeh-ye romān [The theory of the novel] (H. Mortażavī, Trans.). Gheṣṣeh. [In Persian]
18. Mollāebrāhīmī, E., & Raḥīmī, Ṣ. (2017). "Barrasī-ye ravābeṭ-e beynāmatnī-ye asṭūreī dar ashʿār-e Jabra Ibrāhīm Jabra bā takiyeh bar asṭūreh-ye Tammūz" [An examination of mythological intertextual relations in Jabra Ibrahim Jabra's poetry, with emphasis on the myth of Tammuz]. Pazhūheshnāmeh-ye Naqd-e Adabī-ye ʿArabī, 7(2), 183-212.
19. Moʿīn, M. (2007). Farhang-e Moʿīn [Moin Dictionary] (4th ed.). Adnā. [In Persian]
20. Saʿīdī, A., Āzar, E., & Zolfaqārī, H. (2022). "Barrasī-ye bon-māyeh-hā-ye asāṭīrī-ye kehan-algū-ye sāyeh bar pāyeh-ye naẓariyyeh-ye Jung dar panjāh dāstān-e ʿāmiyāneh" [An examination of the mythological motifs of the shadow archetype, based on Jungian theory, in fifty folktales]. Faṣlnāmeh-ye Bahārestān-e Sokhan, (56), pp. 25-46.
21. Salāmat Bāvil, L. (2019). "Zāl dar Shāhnāmeh bar asās-e naẓariyyāt-e Jung" [Zāl in the Shahnameh based on Jungian theories]. Moṭāleʿāt-e Zabān-e Fārsī, (1), pp. 39-62.
22. Shamsābādī, H., Afżalī, F., Molavī Nāfchī, A., & Lakzāʾiyān Fakūr, P. (2012). "Mawqif al-adab al-Filasṭīnī ʿinda Jabra Ibrāhīm Jabra" [The position of Palestinian literature in the works of Jabra Ibrahim Jabra]. Dirāsāt-e Adab-e Moʿāṣer, 4(16), pp. 112-122.
23. Tavānā, M.-A., & Āzar Kamand, F. (2016). "Kehan-algūhā va asṭūreh-hā-ye sīyāsī-ye ʿaṣr-e modern: Bar asās-e chārchūb-e naẓarī-ye Kārl Gustāv Jung" [Archetypes and political myths in the modern era: Based on Carl Gustav Jung's theoretical framework]. Pazhūhesh-e Sīyāsat-e Naẓarī, 10(19), pp. 1-10.
24. Vāshqānī Farāhānī, E. (2016). "Taḥlīl-e asṭūreh-ye Kayūmars bar asās-e naẓariyyeh-ye ravānshenāsī-ye shakhsiyyat-e Jung" [An analysis of the myth of Kayumars based on Jung's theory of personality psychology]. Zabān va Adabiyyāt-e Fārsī, 24(80), pp. 273-300.
25. al-Yāfī, N. (1980). Muqaddimah li-dirāsat al-ṣūrah al-fanniyyah [An introduction to the study of artistic imagery]. Manshūrāt Wizārat al-Thaqāfah wa al-Irshād al-Qawmī. [In Arabic]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.